Question about Health Care Reform relating to the employer contribution?

Question about Health Care Reform We are subject to the Employer Mandate this year and are trying to determine how much we will need to contribute to our employees' plans to make them “affordable” under the ACA. We would like to use the safe harbor method of using 9.5% of W-2 wages. Is it possible to use this method and charge employees different amounts for the same insurance based on their salaries?

Answer from Jenny A., one of our HR Pros Currently, there is uncertainty around this particular issue as there is no case law or guidance that tells us whether this contribution method will comply with ERISA’s anti-discrimination guidelines. As you know, under the Affordable Care Act, one of the safe harbor methods for determining affordability is to use the 9.5% of the employee’s W-2 wages method.  Another is to use the 9.5% of the employee’s monthly income method.  These methods naturally lend themselves to employers wanting to set their contribution structure based on each employee’s earnings.  And under the Affordable Care Act, doing so would seem to comply with the Act. The problem lies in existing legislation, namely ERISA.  Under the ERISA anti-discrimination guidelines, similarly situated employees must be treated consistently when it comes to contribution.  Disparities in contribution structures must be supported by legitimate employment-based classes of employees.  For example, ERISA allows one contribution schedule for hourly employees and another for salaried employees, as long as similarly situated employees are treated consistently.  Another example is for employees in different geographical locations, so you could contribute 50% to employee only coverage for Georgia employees, and 75% of employee only coverage for California employees and still comply with ERISA. So, using the method you described of each employee paying only 9.5% of their wages for the employee-only portion of their coverage certainly works for ACA compliance, but could potentially violate ERISA’s anti-discrimination guidelines.  Of course, the employer could argue that each employee is paying the same percentage of wages, and that may be a good argument.  Until a case on that point actually arises through, it is difficult for us to predict whether a court of law would consider this an ERISA violation.  Therefore, our recommendation right now is not to use this contribution schedule.  Rather, we recommend setting a blanket contribution amount for all similarly situated employees, publishing that amount in the official plan documents and remaining consistent with that contribution throughout this plan year.  After that time, hopefully we will have some case law to review to see how the courts have decided on this issue. As a side note, if you are looking for the most simple (though perhaps not most cost-effective) method of setting your contribution schedule to meet the affordability provisions of the ACA, my favorite method is the federal poverty level safe harbor.  Rather than being a percentage of income, this method uses a flat amount that the employer can contribute in order to meet the ACA affordability provisions.  For 2015, this amount is $1100.  So as long as no full-time employee has to spend more than $1100/year for the employee-only portion of their health insurance coverage, you have met the affordability test.  Again, this may not be the most cost-effective method, especially if the majority of your employees make more than the federal poverty level, but this is a fairly simple method to use, as it in no way hinges on the employee’s monthly or W-2 wages, which of course may fluctuate.  It also allows for a bit of ease when completing the ACA reporting at the end of the year.

Jenny has over 15 years of Human Resources Management experience. She has worked with clients in a variety of industries to reduce exposure to employment-related liability and assist with employee relationship issues. Jenny holds a Bachelors of Business Administration (BBA) from the University of Georgia and a Masters of Business Administration (MBA) degree with a concentration in Human Resources Management from Georgia State University. She is certified as an SPHR (Senior Professional in Human Resources) through the Human Resource Certification Institute.

Contact information

Agency Marketing Services 25200 Crenshaw Blvd. Ste 202 PO Box 4020 Torrance, CA 90510 Phone: 800 334-7875 Email: info@amsinsure.com Visit us online

Legal Disclaimer: The HR Support Center is not engaged in the practice of law. This response should not be relied upon or construed as legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. If you have legal questions concerning your situation or the information you have obtained, you should consult with a licensed attorney. The Company can in no way be held liable for any actions taken as a result of this correspondence. To change your subscription preferences, please click Unsubscribe. © 2015 HR Support Center

VA vs Employer Coverage? And Covered Ca.

Posted: 09 Jan 2015 09:23 AM PST

Question: I have had no medical insurance for 2014 except for how I am covered at the VA. The job I have for 2015 now offers insurance. Will I be penalized for using the VA and not acquiring CC insurance for 2014? Answer: VA health coverage is recognized by the ACA aa meeting the "minimum acceptable coverage" requirement, so you are not subject to penalty if you opt out of your employer-based coverage. If you take the employer's coverage and keep the VA coverage, your benefits will be coordinated with the employer coverage used first and the VA covering the gaps.

Have you updated your new employee waiting periods?

Health Care Waiting Periods

The beginning of 2015 is ripe with new health care reform requirements. While the majority of these, such as the implementation of the first phase of the Employer Mandate and the reporting requirements for health coverage, impose additional burdens on employers, the California-specific change actually relaxes an earlier requirement. The previously-in-effect cap of 60 calendar days on waiting limits for otherwise eligible employees to be allowed to join an employer-sponsored health plan will be gone on January 1, 2015. With this requirement removed, employers are permitted to follow the federal waiting period cap of no more than 90 calendar days.



We can help you with your new options, contact us at info@amsinsure.com or call 800-334-7875

ACA's employer mandate goes into effect for some businesses

Businesses with 100 or more full-time employees must offer health insurance to at least 70% of those employees this year or face a tax penalty under the Affordable Care Act. New reporting requirements also take effect this year, and some consultants are offering training sessions. American City Business Journals/Portland, Ore./Health Care Inc. Northwest blog (12/29)