|
|
The IRS and Social
Security Administration released Rev.
Proc. 2014-61, which announced the 2015 cost-of-living (COLA) adjustments
that apply to health flexible spending accounts (FSAs). The new annual limit
for health FSAs, including general-purpose and limited-purpose health FSAs,
is $2,550 for plan years starting on or after January 1, 2015.
|
|
The $2,550 limit is
prorated for short plan years (plan years that are shorter than 12 months),
and any carryover amount from participants’ previous plan years may be added
to the limit. The $500 carryover does not count against or affect the $2,550
salary reduction limit.
|
|
|
Example: Participants may elect $2,550 for the 2015
plan year and carry over a maximum of $500 from the previous plan year,
making their total account value $3,050 for the 2015 plan year.
|
Employers may also
make non-elective contributions to participants’ accounts. Special rules
apply to employer contributions, so please contact your CONEXIS
representative if you have questions concerning employer non-elective
contributions.
|
Where employers stay informed of benefits, companies, state and federal legislation, payroll and HR portals.
Welcome to AMS Blog
Let us know your thoughts, question and suggestions!
Friday, October 31, 2014
IRS Releases New 2015 Limit for Health FSAs
Thursday, October 30, 2014
Proposition 45, a view
Proposition 45's authors wrote Proposition 103, which regulates property and casualty insurance. They claim they want to regulate health insurance the same way that California regulates property and casualty insurance. Because we are in the industry, we know there are significant differences between purchasing health insurance and property/casualty insurance.
Friday, October 17, 2014
Calif. Mandates Paid Sick Leave for Employees Beginning July 2015
October 14, 2014
Paid Sick Time Scope
The new California paid sick time accrual may be used by covered employees for:
- “Diagnosis, care or treatment of an existing health condition of, or preventive care for, an employee or an employee’s family member,” or
- Leave needed if a victim of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking.
Carryover and Use
The new law requires that accrued paid sick leave carry over to the following year of employment (i.e., employers are not allowed to institute a “use it or lose it” policy with respect to such paid time). However, with respect to the use of accrued time (whether regularly accrued or carried over), employers:
- May limit an employee’s use of paid sick days to 24 hours or three (3) days in each year of employment.
- May limit an employee’s total accrual of paid sick leave to 48 hours or six (6) days.
- Are not required to provide compensation to an employee for accrued, unused paid sick days upon the employee’s separation from employment (unlike accrued paid vacation under California law).
The new law establishes additional recordkeeping, posting and notice requirements. Employers will have to keep at least three years of records documenting the hours worked and paid sick days accrued and used by an employee. Employers also will be required to post notice about sick pay. Finally, an amendment to Labor Code § 2810.5 will require employers to provide employees with written notice upon hire about an employee’s rights with regard to sick pay in California.
Integration with Existing Policies
Employers who already have a paid leave or paid time-off policy are not required to provide additional paid sick days, so long as the employer makes available an amount of leave that may be used for the same purposes and under the same conditions as set forth under the new law. However, even employers with existing paid time-off policies will have to comply with the new notice and recordkeeping obligations discussed above.
All employers covered by this new California law also will need to integrate the new law with their current policies, including those related to Labor Code § 233 (“kin care leave”), family medical leave, and all other protected leaves that California provides employees. For example, established paid sick leave policies that meet the requirements of Labor Code § 233 may need amendment, as the new law extends an employee’s right to use paid sick leave benefits to care for a broader range of family members than Section 233 provides, including grandparents, grandchildren and siblings. The new law’s expansive definition of “family member” similarly goes beyond the definitions in place under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA), such that employees may be entitled to paid sick leave that is not chargeable to their unpaid FMLA or CFRA entitlements in some circumstances.
Action Steps
Violation of these new statutory requirements can result in significant administrative fines, civil penalties, and awards of attorney’s fees and costs against employers. Employers with California employees should carefully review any sick leave or paid time-off policies, as well as wage statement practices, new-hire paperwork, workplace postings and recordkeeping procedures for their full- and part-time employees in the state. Employers also should consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with the nuances of the new legislation.
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
New California Law requires employers to provide paid leave.
Mondaq News Alerts
(registration)
Once an employee works 30 days, an employer is required
to provide an ... policy (or paid time off policy) provides the same benefits
as the new law (i.e., it provides at least ... The new law will affect almost
all employers in California.
Do you have an employee handbook, we can help you to provide one as a client at no cost:
Thursday, August 21, 2014
Nearly 7M Might Enroll Outside HIX Open Enrollment
|
|
Despite open enrollment for Affordable Care
Act plans not starting until November 15, a new report estimates that nearly
7 million adults may be able to enroll through special enrollment periods.
READ MORE » |
Wednesday, August 20, 2014
Medicare Open Enrollment starts November 15th
Looking for or to reconsider your Medicare Insurance options or if you’re satisfied with your current coverage, you needn’t do anything—your coverage will renew automatically. If not, Contact us for a Medicare Supplement Plan.
Original Medicare, the government insurance program geared primarily for seniors, has three parts:
Now, before open enrollment begins November 15, is the time to learn more about your options.
Your Medicare Options
Medicare-eligible individuals have two options for obtaining health insurance: original Medicare or a Medicare Advantage plan.Original Medicare, the government insurance program geared primarily for seniors, has three parts:
- Part A, hospitalization insurance. Medicare Part A helps cover inpatient care in hospitals and skilled nursing facilities. It also helps cover hospice care and some home health care. It does not cover custodial or long-term care. U.S. citizens and lawfully admitted aliens who have lived in the U.S. for a five-year period when they turn 65 automatically qualify for Part A coverage. Individuals who develop end-stage renal disease or certain other disabilities may also qualify. Most people do not pay a premium.
- Part B, medical insurance. Medicare Part B helps pay for doctors’ services and outpatient care. It covers some other medical services. These include physical and occupational therapist services and some home health care when medically necessary. For most people, the federal government pays about 75 percent of the cost of Part B coverage; enrollees pays the rest. Higher-income people (about 5 percent of beneficiaries) will pay higher premiums.
- Medicare Part D, prescription drug insurance. The Part D monthly premium varies by plan and your income—higher-income consumers may pay more. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) estimated average 2014 premiums for basic Medicare Part D plans at $31 per month. As with Part B, higher-income people will pay more.
- Medicare supplement (“Medigap”) plans. Unlike Medicare Parts A, B and D, private insurers underwrite Medigap policies. They must adhere to specific plan designs that cover a specific set of benefits. In most states, policies are identified by letters. Not all plans are available in all states.
As the name suggests, Medicare supplement plans supplement the coverage under traditional Medicare. These policies can help pay some of the out-of-pocket costs you’ll have with original Medicare, such as copayments, coinsurance and deductibles. Some Medigap policies also cover services that original Medicare excludes, such as medical care when you travel outside the U.S. If you have original Medicare and you buy a Medigap policy, Medicare will pay its share of the Medicare-approved amount for covered health care costs. Then your Medigap policy pays its share.
Private Exchanges:
The New Business Model for Insurers and Employers
Private Exchanges: The New Business Model for Insurers and Employers examines the details of how private exchanges work, which models are most successful at gaining members, and the pros and cons for insurers of taking part in nonproprietary exchanges versus building their own. This report is filled with valuable, practical intelligence from several national private exchange experts, on topics such as:
- The business model for private exchanges and how insurers expect to prosper by operating their own proprietary exchanges or selling coverage on other marketplaces.
- How defined contribution is playing into employer decision making and the ramifications of shifting health benefits to private exchanges.
- The differences between private exchanges and traditional "slice" business.
- The opportunities and threats that private exchanges present for insurers.
- The membership tradeoff for insurers — membership gain from previously closed relationships (such as an employer with another carrier) vs. potential loss of membership in exclusive employer relationships.
- How much revenue insurers can generate with the potential move of employers from self-insured to fully insured benefit plans.
This week's health care reform news:
Enrollment verifications expected to reduce Exchange numbers
The administration is sending
letters to more than 300,000 people warning that health coverage purchased
through an exchange could be cut off unless eligibility issues, such as
immigration status, are resolved. Similar eligibility follow‐ups are expected
soon for reported income.
Monday, August 11, 2014
Preparing employers for 2015 health plan enrollment growth.
By Kathleen Koster
August 8, 2014
Open enrollment rates for employer-sponsored health plans in 2014 remained flat, but advisers and their employer clients are already putting strategies in place to prepare for expected growth in 2015 enrollments.
Despite the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that individuals seek health insurance coverage in 2014 and the fact that employers are already preparing for the health reform law’s employer shared responsibility provision, open enrollment levels for employer-sponsored health plans remained mostly unchanged from 2013, new research from Mercer shows. On average, 69.3% of employees enrolled in employer-sponsored health plans in 2014, up only slightly from 69.1% in 2013.
In 2015, researchers expect there will be at least some growth; especially since the individual mandate penalty for obtaining coverage will be higher and more employers will open their plans to newly eligible employees under the ACA shared responsibility rules.
Benefit advisers have already begun to work with employers to put strategies in place to diminish the burden of increased health care costs an enrollment surge could bring.
Managing growth in eligibility
To manage a potential uptick in employees eligible for health coverage in 2015, 10% of employers will decrease the number of employees working 30+ hours per week by next year, the Mercer survey found. Another 14% are making additional adjustments to their workforce strategies.
The survey found retail and hospitality industries, which have a higher proportion of low-wage, part-time workers, are most concerned about higher enrollment in plans. These groups are followed by the higher education sector, in which adjunct professors make up a significant portion of the faculty, yet typically are not eligible for health benefits.
What’s more, employers are concerned about becoming “dependent magnets” and attracting additional dependents and spouses, as more employees become eligible for coverage and the individual mandate penalty stiffens. About 20% of employers said they would raise the employee contribution for dependent coverage in 2014.
To further curb the number of dependents on their plans in 2015, employers are considering special provisions for employees’ spouses who have other coverage available. Currently only one-fifth of employers have such a provision in place —12% require a surcharge and 8% exclude spouses with other coverage entirely. However, this practice may gain in popularity as many employers are considering it —16% considering a surcharge and 12% considering a spousal exclusion, the survey found.
In 2015, researchers expect there will be at least some growth; especially since the individual mandate penalty for obtaining coverage will be higher and more employers will open their plans to newly eligible employees under the ACA shared responsibility rules.
Benefit advisers have already begun to work with employers to put strategies in place to diminish the burden of increased health care costs an enrollment surge could bring.
Managing growth in eligibility
To manage a potential uptick in employees eligible for health coverage in 2015, 10% of employers will decrease the number of employees working 30+ hours per week by next year, the Mercer survey found. Another 14% are making additional adjustments to their workforce strategies.
The survey found retail and hospitality industries, which have a higher proportion of low-wage, part-time workers, are most concerned about higher enrollment in plans. These groups are followed by the higher education sector, in which adjunct professors make up a significant portion of the faculty, yet typically are not eligible for health benefits.
What’s more, employers are concerned about becoming “dependent magnets” and attracting additional dependents and spouses, as more employees become eligible for coverage and the individual mandate penalty stiffens. About 20% of employers said they would raise the employee contribution for dependent coverage in 2014.
To further curb the number of dependents on their plans in 2015, employers are considering special provisions for employees’ spouses who have other coverage available. Currently only one-fifth of employers have such a provision in place —12% require a surcharge and 8% exclude spouses with other coverage entirely. However, this practice may gain in popularity as many employers are considering it —16% considering a surcharge and 12% considering a spousal exclusion, the survey found.
Wednesday, August 06, 2014
Health care reform: Know the rules and penalties of the individual mandate
The individual mandate starts in January 2014 and is an important part of the Affordable Care Act. The individual mandate requires people legally living in the U.S. to buy a minimum amount of health coverage unless they are exempt. In general, people who don’t have to file taxes due to low income are exempt from the individual mandate.
But how does it work? And what are the penalties for people who don't get coverage?
How the individual mandate works
When your clients file their 2014 taxes in 2015, they’ll need to report whether or not they had health coverage in 2014. If they did have coverage, they will need to report if they qualified for a tax credit or subsidy. Health coverage includes a group plan, an individual plan, Medicare or Medicaid. If they don’t have health coverage, they could face a tax penalty. Each year, the penalty increases.
What are the tax penalties?
If a person doesn’t have a health plan, he or she will pay a tax penalty as follows:.
- 2014: Penalty is the larger amount - $95 or 1% of taxable earnings
- 2015: Penalty is the larger amount - $325 or 2% of taxable earnings
- 2016: Penalty is the larger amount - $695 or 2.5% of taxable earnings
Your clients may qualify for a tax credit through the exchange based on their incomes. People earning between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level can qualify if they are not eligible for other sources of minimum essential coverage, including government-sponsored programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.
This includes:
- Individuals with modified adjusted gross incomes of $11,490 to $45,960 a year
- Families of four with modified adjusted gross incomes of $23,550 to $ 94,200 a year.
Your clients may qualify for cost-sharing subsidies based on their income. This includes:
- Individuals with modified adjusted gross incomes of $11,490 to $28,725 a year.
- Families of four with modified adjusted gross incomes of $23,500 to $58,875 a year.
Tuesday, August 05, 2014
HR Tip of the Month

HR Tip of the Month
Employers Consider Expanding Voluntary Benefits
|
Critical illness insurance, identity theft coverage and financial
counseling services are among the voluntary benefits companies are considering
offering to employees, a recent survey found. Critical illness and accident insurance
are increasingly seen as complementary to consumer-driven health plans and have
driven voluntary sales over the past year, research shows. Employee Benefit News (8/4) read more
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
Study Shows Members Enrolled in CDHPs Experience Lower Health Care Costs
Today, the operator of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas (BCBSTX) released the results of its annual Consumer Directed Health Plan (CDHP) study. The study shows that individuals enrolled in CDHPs continue to experience lower health care costs and take advantage of more preventive health measures, long after switching from their traditional insurance plans.
In fact, the study found that after switching from a traditional plan to a CDHP, members saw a three-year average reduction in:
- Medical expenses — decreased by 11.8 percent
- Overall spending, combined medical and pharmacy costs — decreased by 10.5 percent
- Inpatient care costs — decreased by 23.5 percent
- Outpatient care costs — decreased by 5.1 percent
- Professional services costs — decreased by 14 percent
Monday, July 28, 2014
IRS Publishes Form Drafts for New ACA Employer Reporting Requirement
Please note; check with your payroll or HR provider for information.
On
Thursday, July 24, 2014, the IRS published highly anticipated drafts of the
forms large employers with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees will be
required to use for the Code 6056 reporting requirement. Code 6056
requires applicable large employers to file a transmittal with the IRS (Form
1094-C) and provide a new return to employees (Form 1095-C) in January 2016 for
the 2015 calendar year. This reporting requirement has a triple purpose,
as it is designed to allow the IRS to enforce the employer mandate, enforce the
individual mandate, and confirm eligibility for premium tax credits for
coverage purchased through an Exchange.
This
reporting and disclosure requirement is new for employers and may catch some
employers off-guard. For example, the reporting requires collection and
disclosure of information including, but not limited to, the following:
- Social Security numbers of employees, spouses and dependents;
- Names and EINs of other employers within the employer’s controlled group of corporations for each month of the calendar year;
- Number of full-time employees for each calendar month;
- Total number of employees (full-time equivalents) for each calendar month;
- Section 4980H transition relief indicators for each calendar month;
- Employee’s share of the lowest-cost monthly premium for self-only, minimum value coverage for each calendar month; and
- Applicable Section 4980H safe harbor for each calendar month.
Please
note these forms are in draft form only and are subject to change. The IRS has
not yet released instructions for the forms, which should provide the detail
necessary to complete some of the more ambiguous cells in the forms. The first
transmittal and returns will not be filed until January 2016, but much of the
information must be reported for each calendar month of 2015. Ensuring internal
time and attendance systems, record management, and payroll systems are capable
of producing the required information is critical. Although there is much
information left to be released by the IRS concerning the Code 6056 reporting
requirement, employers subject to this requirement should begin preparing now.
Wednesday, July 23, 2014
More Patients Are Visiting Retail Clinics
Insurance Insider News:Insurance Insider News: Employees Unhappy with Benefits
by Leila Morris
Monday, July 07, 2014
DOL limits employer contributions for medical FSAs
|
|
A recent technical release issued by the
U.S. Department of Labor imposes severe dollar limits on employers wanting to
make pre-tax contributions to the medical flexible spending accounts for
eligible employees.
READ MORE » |
Thursday, June 26, 2014
IRS Reiterates Prohibition of and Penalty for Pre-Tax Employer Reimbursement for Health Premiums
Recently, the IRS issued a Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQ) list that reiterates earlier guidance disallowing pre-tax
employer reimbursements for employee health care premiums. The FAQ also calls
attention to the $100 per day, per employee penalty for non-compliance.
The initial guidance from last fall indicated that pre-tax employer reimbursements for healthcare premiums would be categorized as group health plans and, thus, would not be permissible as they would not comply with the requirements for group health plans under the Affordable Care Act. Since that time, however, many people have attempted to find alternate solutions in order to continue the practice of reimbursing employee premiums in lieu of providing a full health plan. This latest FAQ and penalty announcement clarifies that the IRS is serious about disallowing this arrangement. We recommend that employers who still utilize a pre-tax health care premium reimbursement benefit discontinue this practice. Any advice that employers have heeded with regard to these benefits still being allowed, should be carefully reexamined in light of this most recent guidance and penalty reminder.
|
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
California Minimum Wage Increases July 1, 2014
Effective July 1, California will raise its
minimum hourly wage from $8.00 to $9.00. The increase will also affect the
minimum salary requirement for several categories of employees that are exempt
from minimum wage and overtime requirements. The minimum salary of exempt
executive, administrative and professional employees will increase to $3120.00
per month (twice the state minimum wage). Commissioned, inside sales employees’
minimum hourly rate will increase to $13.50 per hour (in order to maintain the
one-and-a-half times minimum wage requirement for their exempt status).
We recommend that employers review the pay rates of both their non-exempt and exempt California employees to ensure that they are in compliance with the new minimum rates by July 1, 2014.
We recommend that employers review the pay rates of both their non-exempt and exempt California employees to ensure that they are in compliance with the new minimum rates by July 1, 2014.
Monday, June 23, 2014
Five Ways health care spending can be curbed
Top Stories
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)